{"id":"W2151371905","doi":"10.1590/s1516-31802005000500008","title":"Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Medicine; Rigour; Context (archaeology); Misconduct; Dilemma; Ethical standards; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Alternative medicine; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04456626,0.0003189097,0.001419347,0.000451783,0.001422057,0.0001847634,0.00335681,0.007092606,0.005895722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0184611,0.0002257622,0.0005222914,0.001107593,0.006319367,0.0004492391,0.0001854684,0.02643165,0.0001226828],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01593892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003139359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003084719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878666,0.003288623,0.001400136,0.0004275982,0.00601951,0.0009975418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946182,0.001292513,0.0008378691,0.0002786715,0.0005257645,0.002446963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003024972,0.00005320789,0.000001663119,0.00030243,0.00002632209,0.00008523907,0.003595103,4.599412e-8,7.980572e-8,0.01630604,0.004788303,0.9748386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008622534,0.00006353173,0.000003573842,0.007229606,0.0001761877,0.0004625812,0.0005432022,0.000009188328,1.753602e-7,0.003546461,0.987632,0.0002472774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002712478,0.9777679,0.0003465862,0.006186103,0.00219376,0.000232601,0.00001878873,0.00004376736,0.01318336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002087298,0.9909747,0.0007107437,0.0009458446,0.00671674,0.000004636345,0.00000657248,0.00002159539,0.0004104936],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0935405047284181,"score_gpt":0.4614142688484015,"score_spread":0.3678737641199834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}