{"id":"W2151372827","doi":"10.1017/s0265052500002843","title":"Fairness in Holdings: A Natural Law Account of Property and Welfare Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Reformed Theology and Governance","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Law; Natural (archaeology); Positive law; Political science; Natural order; Property (philosophy); Conviction; Property rights; Divine law; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Private law; Black letter law; Epistemology; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008402419,0.0003315339,0.0004969619,0.001391681,0.005291861,0.005488853,0.001981737,0.004360672,0.01095964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008608284,0.000282723,0.001026377,0.001202013,0.02387305,0.01314957,0.004665676,0.004055911,0.0007510999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005172533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00452829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007328226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005725193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950731,0.002082983,0.0001411196,0.0007152919,0.001076895,0.0009105827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963124,0.001913523,0.0003698968,0.0006530427,0.0005274514,0.000223704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001176641,0.00000244291,0.00003338802,0.000002357529,7.843122e-7,0.000008889825,0.0001253772,0.00007640167,0.000007573424,0.9991008,0.0002284917,0.0004121941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004032932,0.000002881923,0.00008297708,0.00001214831,0.000001709777,0.0000112195,0.00009452279,0.0003061654,0.00002020277,0.9933909,0.006071304,0.000001873437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0483596,0.003025174,0.1962879,0.05068824,0.0006421102,0.0001310029,0.0002039625,0.00007547397,0.7005866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528987,0.000882284,0.009942361,0.003361187,0.0007013725,0.000181247,0.00006897151,0.00004580839,0.03191811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01095964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04443681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01811695153312693,"score_gpt":0.2427284991964613,"score_spread":0.2246115476633344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}