{"id":"W2151620586","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3885","title":"ON THE COGNITIVE FOUNDATION AND ABSTRACT MEANS OF ENGINEERING DESIGNS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Cognitive Computing and Networks","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Abstraction; Context (archaeology); Software engineering; Software system; Notation; Engineering design process; Process (computing); Programming language; Software; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009392994,0.0009869311,0.0007776045,0.004172588,0.002373549,0.009169336,0.001808506,0.002473328,0.004172835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01648054,0.0006773056,0.001735524,0.002321491,0.03662807,0.01530433,0.0040086,0.004640564,0.0007243089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004915551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003533753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004536123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002496685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904906,0.005079093,0.0007054482,0.001309991,0.002020039,0.0003948089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833203,0.01149614,0.0008822355,0.002806115,0.00120137,0.0002939019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000279132,0.000003683524,0.00004189471,0.00002685274,0.000003918855,0.00001321987,0.0006185402,0.0007507802,0.00006790759,0.9955011,0.0001455461,0.002823899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006468405,0.000007377617,0.00006343951,0.00004361906,0.000004839864,0.00002060092,0.0001246148,0.002007942,0.0001100301,0.9901221,0.007480586,0.000008168039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01420059,0.00325635,0.9094567,0.006810712,0.000231689,0.00008114633,0.0001030816,0.0003885093,0.06547125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5046629,0.003362547,0.4791756,0.001383503,0.00050575,0.0005847933,0.0002627883,0.0002381326,0.009823882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009392994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04967546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02180630535030866,"score_gpt":0.2049994674273458,"score_spread":0.1831931620770372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}