{"id":"W2151658938","doi":"10.1177/2150131910397704","title":"The SIMARD Screening Tool to Identify Unfit Drivers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Primary Care & Community Health","topic":"Older Adults Driving Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; NOSM University; University of Ottawa; Lakehead University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Cut-off; Indeterminate; Medicine; Cut-point; Receiver operating characteristic; Statistics; Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Test (biology); Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Computer science; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00534986,0.0002347782,0.0006549554,0.0002112326,0.006456808,0.00003114066,0.001302704,0.0001154185,0.0000550225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000948578,0.00016872,0.0002109168,0.0003364554,0.0001380086,0.0003190432,0.0009942868,0.003775471,0.00006802321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002468232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002157748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00504008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01856488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933153,0.003729051,0.001371101,0.000133936,0.0006504169,0.0008002087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941085,0.002106561,0.00119439,0.0009767985,0.001235805,0.0003779668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002655421,0.0001753157,0.5674282,0.001204253,0.0002711067,0.00002405662,0.2271475,0.0000139309,0.00008290804,0.0002198914,0.07865713,0.1245101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007978193,0.0005856857,0.8790807,0.001242724,0.00003445492,0.00001086223,0.07613314,8.775511e-7,0.000006479129,0.0002414663,0.04171626,0.000149527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582952,0.001880048,0.002725659,0.007698318,0.002478998,0.001058739,0.00003440443,0.00009736425,0.02573125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811817,0.0009847058,0.007715667,0.009400653,0.000350239,0.00001555193,0.000006604922,0.00004697358,0.0002978909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3116525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1597206929801137,"score_gpt":0.4405590897993624,"score_spread":0.2808383968192487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}