{"id":"W2151890713","doi":"10.6000/1929-5030.2012.01.02.9","title":"Interaction Energy Analysis for Drug-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes in Aqueous Solutions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Solution Chemistry and Modeling","topic":"Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Cyclodextrin; Interaction energy; Intermolecular force; Computational chemistry; Aqueous solution; Intermolecular interaction; Inclusion (mineral); Molecule; Molecular mechanics; Stereochemistry; Organic chemistry; Molecular dynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000161689,0.0002963937,0.0002605938,0.0007391907,0.0003157056,0.0002795823,0.0002791154,0.0002679959,0.001689624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002979937,0.0001416343,0.000262821,0.0003913176,0.0002151257,0.0002808583,0.0003008119,0.0003141683,0.0002710287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002683976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001619968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007002168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004576247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998851,0.00001570766,0.000008959341,0.00001869302,0.00005359414,0.00001794624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999088,0.00005278815,0.000009971579,0.000003338736,0.0000184365,0.000006553832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003330576,0.000209223,0.001675602,0.0002134415,0.00005288921,0.0003148414,0.0001886898,0.03100127,0.9466463,0.005800244,0.0002601407,0.01330438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000328526,0.0002440072,0.004282821,0.00001716227,0.0000331779,0.0001826615,0.0001270228,0.4321885,0.5585475,0.001943619,0.002367479,0.00003320493],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966517,0.0008632782,0.02827796,0.00007488012,0.00001717529,0.00005259423,0.0001399712,0.00009655439,0.003960569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905612,0.0004506377,0.007240087,0.00002270443,0.0000035144,0.0001042864,0.0001589853,0.00002050845,0.001438149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001689624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005652308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1240198847238765,"score_gpt":0.3978233323833886,"score_spread":0.2738034476595121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}