{"id":"W2152029010","doi":"10.1109/isplc.2005.1430472","title":"Low-density parity-check coding for impulse noise correction on power-line channels","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Low-density parity-check code; Impulse noise; Computer science; Additive white Gaussian noise; Gaussian noise; Algorithm; Coding gain; Binary erasure channel; Erasure; Electronic engineering; Channel capacity; Channel (broadcasting); Decoding methods; Telecommunications; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001370279,0.0001509258,0.000164399,0.00009029137,0.00009733067,0.00001723173,0.0001651543,0.00009626798,0.00004626145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006221681,0.0001597295,0.0000628913,0.0001110229,0.00001871999,0.0001920575,0.00003939489,0.0001967032,0.00004399776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001617603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005314524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007136241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003048195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993212,0.00001343373,0.0002188669,0.0001531032,0.00008823825,0.0002051315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992793,0.0001230229,0.00003780647,0.0004268787,0.00007332308,0.0000596245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001921382,0.000654488,0.0001387522,0.000185922,0.00009501665,0.000002375581,0.0009885991,0.4465622,0.1704907,0.01163516,0.05599715,0.3130575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002357458,0.00008276996,0.00008384293,0.00004509982,0.000004383859,0.000002785576,0.00003598764,0.3062035,0.6847778,0.0003485636,0.007973666,0.0002059475],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0677849,0.00005909486,0.9242391,0.0003174741,0.0005146991,0.0004377294,0.000006107522,0.002221333,0.004419587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785116,0.0002162593,0.02018714,0.0001966869,0.0001031321,0.00007943741,0.00002050505,0.00004276987,0.0006425137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9107267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6513579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01582177870762521,"score_gpt":0.2697095982619168,"score_spread":0.2538878195542916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}