{"id":"W2152029010","doi":"10.1109/isplc.2005.1430472","title":"Low-density parity-check coding for impulse noise correction on power-line channels","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Low-density parity-check code; Impulse noise; Computer science; Additive white Gaussian noise; Gaussian noise; Algorithm; Coding gain; Binary erasure channel; Erasure; Electronic engineering; Channel capacity; Channel (broadcasting); Decoding methods; Telecommunications; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005299488,0.0003060569,0.0003486623,0.0003341301,0.0003124403,0.0004502385,0.0003548456,0.0004136778,0.0005551648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00309892,0.0001305462,0.0001366467,0.0003178135,0.000664251,0.0005714235,0.0004741428,0.0003995929,0.0001325403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004426835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004490103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007839036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007912095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999559,0.0001723992,0.00001408764,0.00004251809,0.0001571847,0.00005486917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983717,0.001072135,0.000183416,0.0001528306,0.000187165,0.00003281065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003782352,0.00007165277,0.0019079,0.0002165512,0.00005640425,0.0005202751,0.0003080812,0.7073715,0.04678,0.1331707,0.001179724,0.1080391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001933437,0.00007255257,0.0001712428,0.00001437719,0.00001183621,0.00008148487,0.00001264757,0.9726596,0.01135,0.01455918,0.001035707,0.00001192101],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1360217,0.0004393435,0.8606545,0.0001994775,0.00003965507,0.00004012378,0.00003780018,0.0002623903,0.002304948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294128,0.0002524397,0.06896167,0.0000590351,0.00003776218,0.00004767095,0.00004147104,0.00001749941,0.001169629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0007839036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003211915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01582177870762521,"score_gpt":0.2697095982619168,"score_spread":0.2538878195542916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}