{"id":"W2152121775","doi":"10.1109/icmens.2004.1509007","title":"Equilibrium and Stability of Micro-Cantilevers Used in Atomic Force Microscopy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cantilever; Atomic force microscopy; Magnetic force microscope; Materials science; Non-contact atomic force microscopy; Atomic force acoustic microscopy; Nanotechnology; Stability (learning theory); Microscopy; Conductive atomic force microscopy; Physics; Computer science; Composite material; Optics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001200091,0.000224324,0.0003653547,0.0005734685,0.0007423455,0.0006448781,0.001100773,0.0007994777,0.001708921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003256112,0.0003400072,0.0001693066,0.0003777598,0.0007646427,0.0009446645,0.0004620886,0.0006361161,0.0004671657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005884139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002399173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009042705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001314153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988101,0.0001702749,0.00006517056,0.0002476042,0.0005928199,0.0001140807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984895,0.0007146516,0.0001169333,0.0001452655,0.0004571502,0.00007643354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268561,0.00002145546,0.001095746,0.00007525944,0.00001382203,0.00007063332,0.0002162627,0.0004881867,0.9875315,0.002335215,0.0001211618,0.007903928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002713724,0.0002804585,0.01237153,0.000040087,0.0000211734,0.0002958299,0.0002547962,0.01948131,0.9603955,0.002310572,0.004454385,0.00006720606],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090142,0.006309005,0.07980159,0.000308976,0.0001535286,0.00009670186,0.0003537342,0.0002424715,0.003719775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634874,0.000993582,0.0337375,0.00007170265,0.00001629906,0.0001150097,0.0002195612,0.00005105031,0.001307854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001708921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006346762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007686791546553295,"score_gpt":0.2601545810005116,"score_spread":0.2524677894539584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}