{"id":"W2152149676","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00968.x","title":"Prospective Examination of Self‐Regulatory Efficacy in Predicting Walking for Active Transportation: A Social Cognitive Theory Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social cognitive theory; Psychology; Schedule; Cognition; Self-efficacy; Multilevel model; Regression analysis; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002460608,0.0003199592,0.0002386593,0.0006993494,0.0005493962,0.0007323648,0.0002683789,0.0005414072,0.001126815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004240256,0.0004373471,0.0006061606,0.0004636575,0.0004235563,0.0004364323,0.0004754086,0.00122966,0.0002580539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000180474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004454162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003095555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005690546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995043,0.0002383382,0.0000422378,0.00005851099,0.00008424988,0.00007244351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997125,0.001084224,0.0006863963,0.0002534966,0.0003522328,0.000498627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004611363,0.0003329761,0.998338,0.000003356651,0.00002939357,0.00001205306,0.0001762294,0.00004741627,0.00007245517,0.00002245079,0.00002741381,0.000892188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007318611,0.0004632632,0.9983044,0.000003925808,0.0000227809,0.00003279895,0.000301794,0.0006664993,0.00007449543,0.0000453613,0.00007403083,0.000003329277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996626,0.00002076561,0.00008907427,0.00001557423,0.000002244267,0.00001046379,0.00003780644,0.000001676914,0.000159726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996052,0.00001600228,0.0001414231,0.000008945916,0.000002464567,0.00002059136,0.00008530812,6.773005e-7,0.0001193212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003095555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01301312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03099729565493577,"score_gpt":0.352522184859294,"score_spread":0.3215248892043583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}