{"id":"W2152149676","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00968.x","title":"Prospective Examination of Self‐Regulatory Efficacy in Predicting Walking for Active Transportation: A Social Cognitive Theory Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social cognitive theory; Psychology; Schedule; Cognition; Self-efficacy; Multilevel model; Regression analysis; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003272594,0.0001288821,0.0004267309,0.0001681813,0.0003724941,0.00001103311,0.0001783839,0.0003001714,0.00002800663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007355667,0.0001309147,0.0001882866,0.0003749231,0.0004237471,0.0003646091,0.000003820561,0.0003569199,3.656798e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000165337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000148116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008584841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004580987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982059,0.0002694763,0.0006237879,0.0001848487,0.000362283,0.000353687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983183,0.0003945152,0.0008676205,0.00004011998,0.0003124922,0.00006696668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003238395,0.00257736,0.08436049,0.0000765006,0.000279221,0.000001330947,0.789444,0.000002037904,0.0005880524,0.07172037,0.00003576446,0.04767654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002574984,0.00006680008,0.9416745,0.00001366636,0.0001323556,2.872981e-7,0.04720125,9.016753e-7,0.0002841683,0.007888284,0.00004957155,0.0001132457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764231,0.00005108955,0.001922055,0.00007119949,0.000271932,0.0007050781,0.00002056624,0.00001957754,0.02051537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997785,0.00000468938,0.0005842641,0.00005984051,0.001488495,0.000041477,0.0000110756,0.00001600912,0.000009088837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.857314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5338545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03099729565493577,"score_gpt":0.352522184859294,"score_spread":0.3215248892043583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}