{"id":"W2152237742","doi":"10.1186/2046-4053-3-33","title":"The challenges of including sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews: a qualitative survey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Systematic Reviews","topic":"Sex and Gender in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Institute of Gender and Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Systematic review; Multidisciplinary approach; Gender equity; Medicine; Gender analysis; Reproductive health; MEDLINE; Applied psychology; Medical education; Psychology; Social science; Population; Environmental health; Sociology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09839924,0.000371812,0.006385195,0.0003393962,0.0001172444,0.00002371165,0.0003568122,0.0001265797,0.00001332539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03697426,0.0001755559,0.0007221224,0.001470595,0.00006560659,0.000057789,0.0000643799,0.000233871,0.0001199137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000145254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005937866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001976037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009757795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9540869,0.03881939,0.005475635,0.0005079359,0.0007119472,0.0003982164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834073,0.01185757,0.002363351,0.001907598,0.0003188472,0.0001454071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007826679,0.00004075567,0.001903252,0.9589432,0.0006304578,0.000001292291,0.03577748,0.000001265344,0.000003643839,0.002102267,0.0001178768,0.0004707148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001640268,0.0005335136,0.01602283,0.8200007,0.007867332,0.00009600394,0.1442276,0.00322653,0.00002394599,0.002513832,0.002813182,0.001034294],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006922092,0.9493231,0.002225334,0.0006915426,0.000383574,0.03657402,0.000009006786,0.00004353152,0.00382787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9531881,0.04229752,0.0004017492,0.000200808,0.00007049074,0.003457244,0.00001303756,0.00003184447,0.0003392406],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9711377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5078063775541615,"score_gpt":0.5022240876362842,"score_spread":0.005582289917877237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}