{"id":"W2152248723","doi":"10.1177/0093854807307029","title":"Characterizing the Value of Actuarial Violence Risk Assessments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care","funders":"","keywords":"Bayes' theorem; Actuarial science; Statistics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Psychology; Confidence interval; Bayesian probability; Selection bias; Poison control; Population; Risk assessment; Recidivism; Econometrics; Computer science; Medicine; Demography; Mathematics; Economics; Criminology; Artificial intelligence; Medical emergency; Sociology; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03524897,0.001010008,0.001010109,0.004937815,0.000790523,0.005247093,0.001847441,0.001685733,0.002584243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2334687,0.0006327949,0.0005836786,0.002372921,0.002718472,0.005176981,0.003058453,0.002367599,0.0003619313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002693944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001340658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001674108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001258422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.977784,0.0139518,0.0008791909,0.001393487,0.005287841,0.0007036147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7356986,0.236702,0.009470369,0.009931726,0.00729108,0.000906182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004337735,0.000166209,0.05548194,0.0003100879,0.0004359158,0.0003571525,0.001296254,0.3620049,0.001246981,0.3486305,0.003038675,0.2265975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001980924,0.0002950129,0.01047048,0.0002543694,0.0001103089,0.0004256274,0.0005759489,0.6375286,0.00200392,0.3435513,0.004641918,0.0001226697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2681445,0.003938533,0.6803803,0.006964585,0.0001942616,0.0002641471,0.0006586736,0.0005736431,0.03888135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356259,0.0008293933,0.06164897,0.0002044175,0.0001473014,0.0001004126,0.0001717411,0.00008214478,0.001189796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03524897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1864166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07564907505248067,"score_gpt":0.4249226799373393,"score_spread":0.3492736048848587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}