{"id":"W2152303055","doi":"10.1002/asi.23172","title":"“The sum of all human knowledge”: A systematic review of scholarly research on the content of <scp>W</scp>ikipedia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"H. Lundbeck A/S; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Lundbeckfonden; Concordia University; Strategiske Forskningsråd","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Scholarly communication; Mathematics; Publishing; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02508521,0.001179069,0.004223203,0.02442801,0.001147093,0.003969927,0.001866729,0.001802151,0.002354599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08576748,0.001153944,0.002826936,0.02203779,0.001636067,0.005903483,0.002910635,0.001640906,0.0003676348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00383301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02913564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007348226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02847154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9810724,0.007910082,0.005268356,0.001238752,0.004174228,0.0003362049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9323629,0.04772824,0.009437419,0.00143193,0.008206874,0.0008326527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001027723,0.00002780457,0.00175128,0.7450846,0.003004072,0.0001569903,0.002039384,0.0001378247,0.0003496254,0.001563346,0.008319084,0.2374632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005132225,0.0001102738,0.00491001,0.9091108,0.01077216,0.0004442743,0.002404171,0.0001208548,0.0003192443,0.001388404,0.07031633,0.00005218477],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008710086,0.9972498,0.0002662235,0.0007890613,0.0002239378,0.000129652,0.0001586758,0.0000067765,0.0003048904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01277461,0.9845161,0.001198271,0.0006771253,0.0001369651,0.0003524867,0.0002078099,0.000007100903,0.0001295245],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1326649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1398115388801367,"score_gpt":0.4574042468020459,"score_spread":0.3175927079219092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}