{"id":"W2152323722","doi":"10.1175/2009waf2222273.1","title":"Utilizing Normalized Anomalies to Assess Synoptic-Scale Weather Events in the Western United States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Weather and Forecasting","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anomaly (physics); Climatology; Synoptic scale meteorology; Environmental science; Tornado; Troposphere; Scale (ratio); Magnitude (astronomy); Meteorology; Geography; Geology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007167643,0.0001405491,0.0001530717,0.00005043327,0.0001430144,0.0000462611,0.0001804028,0.00004668999,0.0001236023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003390105,0.00009863605,0.00003242231,0.0002727311,0.00004662027,0.000177941,0.00009011892,0.0001062768,0.00002976013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003854666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002634284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005081347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004224096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989233,0.00009895139,0.000226266,0.0002529519,0.0001806333,0.0003178926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995611,0.0001425885,0.00004514325,0.0001814321,0.000005795396,0.00006399077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008799092,0.0002270913,0.9509962,0.00002019046,0.000008884964,0.00001024398,0.0220726,0.01040307,0.003834738,0.0001530144,0.00006402303,0.01212197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001606439,0.0004489363,0.8792618,0.000240012,0.00004691335,0.00007302397,0.007830828,0.09637445,0.0004447957,0.005019478,0.007893043,0.0007602723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868603,0.00001777742,0.0005945177,0.0005087656,0.00002465662,0.0002580938,0.000006171475,0.00002680148,0.01170295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973507,0.00001378105,0.0009799753,0.001259291,0.00001754326,0.00001453125,0.000008140728,0.00001002339,0.000346028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08597139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4022262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05846309458356493,"score_gpt":0.2749983306960776,"score_spread":0.2165352361125127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}