{"id":"W2152349391","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00085.x","title":"Thresholds in Forest Bird Response to Habitat Alteration as Quantitative Targets for Conservation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Snag; Canopy; Seral community; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Deciduous; Forestry; Forest management; Geography; Clearcutting; Biology; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000804258,0.0001306165,0.0001766731,0.0001250463,0.0001720335,0.00001391208,0.0001133323,0.0001349557,0.000121381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001117373,0.0001307238,0.00003481551,0.0002697869,0.0001881056,0.0002579059,0.00006165892,0.00007562617,0.0005272636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001843181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003633331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002558921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04831396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988002,0.000199625,0.0003592364,0.0003336067,0.00006272433,0.0002445801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986963,0.0009379275,0.0001211227,0.0001308898,0.00006587317,0.00004793348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008102148,0.00005503248,0.9567294,0.000003685258,0.000009946548,6.143796e-7,0.0008964182,0.002800982,0.01170371,0.02330196,0.003245527,0.0004425572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007959199,0.0005039871,0.9310901,0.000007281139,0.000005603908,0.000002389404,0.0001158777,0.03363306,0.0002407021,0.01103798,0.02240145,0.0001656556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9326733,0.00005488078,0.01876196,0.047223,0.0001593829,0.0007226121,0.00001316449,0.00005492413,0.0003367514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730626,0.00001729982,0.01399661,0.01201698,0.00002458751,0.000372795,0.000054903,0.00001345533,0.0004407481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04805807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9690518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02529425072754015,"score_gpt":0.3101619443572595,"score_spread":0.2848676936297194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}