{"id":"W2152366088","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00494.x","title":"Polarization and Publicity: Rethinking the Benefits of Deliberative Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Publicity; Politics; Political science; Polarization (electrochemistry); Deliberative democracy; Openness to experience; Scholarship; Public opinion; Law and economics; Democracy; Public relations; Public policy; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01976681,0.0003898316,0.0007768265,0.001226013,0.003600252,0.008986151,0.001489856,0.003826173,0.0064119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08019949,0.000410245,0.0009298336,0.001584049,0.02108276,0.0126061,0.01022995,0.006309115,0.0005768066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003071956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002522687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009816029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008927036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9825248,0.0125239,0.0003469608,0.001078425,0.00212569,0.001400257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9219019,0.0612996,0.004191444,0.008692198,0.002721942,0.001192869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000130151,0.00005411011,0.00203674,0.00008058224,0.00002608079,0.00008252577,0.003803161,0.002121786,0.0004115265,0.9728914,0.0009592408,0.01740256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004048809,0.00003534685,0.001292377,0.00005664454,0.00002496731,0.00003139533,0.0009806752,0.003090075,0.0005269841,0.9876979,0.006208597,0.00001459847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3700474,0.002026283,0.1202107,0.1363089,0.0009681099,0.0001540291,0.0001284547,0.0002094983,0.3699466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937683,0.0002770172,0.003088942,0.001317682,0.0002111399,0.00004844449,0.00001136035,0.00003818041,0.001239087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01976681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1045381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05513745947523144,"score_gpt":0.3471324301915791,"score_spread":0.2919949707163476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}