{"id":"W2152378104","doi":"10.1175/2010jamc2508.1","title":"Lagrangian Coherent Structure Analysis of Terminal Winds Detected by Lidar. Part I: Turbulence Structures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows","field":"Engineering","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Azimuth; Turbulence; Airflow; Lidar; Lyapunov exponent; Meteorology; Wind shear; Lagrangian coherent structures; Divergence (linguistics); Vortex; Geology; Flow (mathematics); Physics; Mechanics; Wind speed; Remote sensing; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001798053,0.0002179561,0.0007983613,0.0003869257,0.00005197706,0.00001231863,0.0002391702,0.000427592,0.0002837572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002026253,0.0001762152,0.0001480005,0.0002923764,0.0002366636,0.00004725263,0.00003421475,0.0007317512,6.222265e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008839797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002069335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002802247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008018679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987308,0.00003106021,0.000633725,0.0001712567,0.000137719,0.0002954554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917,0.000134652,0.0002884722,0.0001987688,0.00008090886,0.0001272019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001154742,0.0001507806,0.04937413,0.0002586813,0.007500453,0.0001493403,0.0009185283,0.01771161,0.8868328,0.01868747,0.00141143,0.01584998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01367537,0.003021843,0.4450516,0.00007682011,0.02345362,0.005447778,0.0006759501,0.301098,0.1397869,0.04171823,0.02265656,0.003337311],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981772,0.0004752445,0.0002424197,0.0000537314,0.0005898253,0.00007358825,0.00008158313,0.00002007555,0.0002863632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982777,0.0001696105,0.001385328,0.00006341027,0.00005799981,0.00000244221,0.00002318808,0.0000168935,0.000003492569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.747046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7185846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003244021984326682,"score_gpt":0.2015586551686728,"score_spread":0.1983146331843461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}