{"id":"W2152378104","doi":"10.1175/2010jamc2508.1","title":"Lagrangian Coherent Structure Analysis of Terminal Winds Detected by Lidar. Part I: Turbulence Structures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows","field":"Engineering","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Azimuth; Turbulence; Airflow; Lidar; Lyapunov exponent; Meteorology; Wind shear; Lagrangian coherent structures; Divergence (linguistics); Vortex; Geology; Flow (mathematics); Physics; Mechanics; Wind speed; Remote sensing; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001304467,0.0001821628,0.00009258255,0.0009229163,0.000116906,0.0002287851,0.0001320461,0.0001154734,0.0003502806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003533832,0.00008316888,0.0001354262,0.0004351694,0.0001307605,0.0002273052,0.0001324441,0.00009661551,0.00009699888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001976871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000223528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005424398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006541715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999956,0.000005511029,0.000002944271,0.000008400408,0.00001867193,0.000008379812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999822,0.00003202737,0.00004631458,0.00001307498,0.00006687731,0.00001977037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000311391,0.0003405699,0.3519621,0.0001757297,0.0000850014,0.0009556276,0.0004925299,0.05391502,0.3781993,0.001053512,0.000927499,0.2115816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002049937,0.0001880094,0.4028568,0.00001954093,0.00004063338,0.0002856213,0.0004018466,0.5438728,0.05144322,0.0002401396,0.0005963116,0.00003450636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880612,0.00005468844,0.01136858,0.00001454782,0.000004553584,0.00001009817,0.0001195963,0.00003090861,0.0003358275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922675,0.00003225933,0.007325709,0.000004908382,0.000002932377,0.000005797387,0.0001553187,0.000003897415,0.000201646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005424398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0107857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003244021984326682,"score_gpt":0.2015586551686728,"score_spread":0.1983146331843461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}