{"id":"W2152394468","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2013.10.012","title":"Cost effectiveness of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: A simulation study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","topic":"Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine; McGill University; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec; Université Laval","funders":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec; Cystic Fibrosis Canada; Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux","keywords":"Cystic fibrosis; Medicine; Percentile; Newborn screening; Cutoff; Cost effectiveness; Pediatrics; Internal medicine; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001758434,0.0003137956,0.001157143,0.0005368451,0.0001293778,0.00008758915,0.0002842596,0.0001215349,0.0001269449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006262403,0.0002481656,0.0004137155,0.0005836811,0.0001458029,0.0005906379,0.00008199589,0.000350467,0.00001627529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002173375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002582616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008254542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003432662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963346,0.0004030773,0.001282369,0.0003136637,0.001153043,0.0005132998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894542,0.006924585,0.000839594,0.0004064174,0.001984063,0.0003912143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03066402,0.003259552,0.06016372,0.006286992,0.001339673,0.00006559285,0.001131931,0.0970519,0.6909232,0.00004250715,0.001247029,0.1078239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01743004,0.02170527,0.8751163,0.006306756,0.001407285,0.0001850452,0.00188773,0.05341896,0.01895851,0.0009940198,0.002120342,0.0004697702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5850983,0.0007651346,0.4103527,0.00008640563,0.0002167991,0.003363846,0.00004755853,0.00002602697,0.00004319348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8498873,0.000005990353,0.1495858,0.00001637722,0.0002397887,0.0001438173,0.00001377325,0.00005420867,0.00005290397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8149526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04233729246231933,"score_gpt":0.3677702864691896,"score_spread":0.3254329940068703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}