{"id":"W2152511683","doi":"10.1109/icqr2mse.2011.5976671","title":"Optimising burn-in procedure and warranty policy in lifecycle costing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Warranty; Burn-in; Activity-based costing; Sensitivity (control systems); Product (mathematics); Reliability engineering; Computer science; Function (biology); Optimal maintenance; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001390532,0.00007081672,0.0000904748,0.0001197791,0.00001491448,0.00001408148,0.00003988337,0.00005594326,0.00002222694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001253663,0.00006656205,0.000009458821,0.0002349759,0.00001611009,0.0001749942,0.00001426353,0.00009298488,0.000002609418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005047379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001218004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003925299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000197489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995223,0.000007816637,0.0001446304,0.0001067141,0.00003968786,0.000178822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998573,0.0000161422,0.000009530279,0.00006966179,0.00001161254,0.00003575631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004461483,0.0001141622,0.08642056,0.0005845441,0.0000116686,0.00002769581,0.01320644,0.8707313,0.002749478,0.004843712,0.0001885056,0.02107734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006420878,0.00002338513,0.0580308,0.0002017069,0.000002541469,0.00001530212,0.0006563551,0.9359425,0.002305141,0.00186993,0.00007405817,0.0002361569],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.934557,0.0001474719,0.01020292,0.0001184854,0.00004970652,0.000220441,6.591168e-7,0.0001586007,0.05454477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880138,0.0001691666,0.01168253,0.00004291763,0.00001919559,0.000007719969,9.066876e-7,0.00001171068,0.00005203889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06521126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2714322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01196221414305247,"score_gpt":0.2028354802091825,"score_spread":0.1908732660661301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}