{"id":"W2152590022","doi":"10.1002/pds.1673","title":"Goodness‐of‐fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","keywords":"Propensity score matching; Covariate; Medicine; Goodness of fit; Statistics; Econometrics; Internal medicine; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.109985,0.001734854,0.003266799,0.006121507,0.001124543,0.002762321,0.003280637,0.002785219,0.009021644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4218439,0.001006551,0.003341131,0.005558822,0.003374644,0.003694887,0.003909301,0.004675891,0.001498464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001233073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003427024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003357903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002004736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8822712,0.1030725,0.003950748,0.005149629,0.004801914,0.0007539637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5346386,0.4319884,0.01105436,0.01612801,0.005251152,0.0009394163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002324708,0.000525869,0.209959,0.001884279,0.006806264,0.001336754,0.001510254,0.182987,0.001457504,0.2092098,0.02798555,0.3540129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004491416,0.001066288,0.03326358,0.0005131447,0.0005499,0.0008488094,0.0004814213,0.7245102,0.001248088,0.2239171,0.01295895,0.0001933192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01494388,0.0005556336,0.9803814,0.0006224261,0.0001236678,0.0005852072,0.0008447599,0.0006087177,0.001334312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4619717,0.000719725,0.5260049,0.001072205,0.0003371565,0.003952517,0.003547239,0.0006218125,0.001772721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.890015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5816632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4490533302099411,"score_gpt":0.428672555624695,"score_spread":0.02038077458524612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}