{"id":"W2152640207","doi":"10.1109/tcst.2002.1014682","title":"A QFT fault-tolerant control for electrohydraulic positioning systems","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology","topic":"Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Quantitative feedback theory; Actuator; Control engineering; Controller (irrigation); Engineering; Fault tolerance; Fault (geology); Robust control; Control system; Hydraulic cylinder; Hydraulic machinery; Computer science; Control (management); Reliability engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004210451,0.0004101963,0.0003075906,0.0002219129,0.0002766903,0.0004004362,0.0006749276,0.0004146061,0.0007727524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009560388,0.0001212676,0.0001423433,0.0001395094,0.0003492697,0.0003939132,0.0002509242,0.000309618,0.0001034917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003490564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000372033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001837763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009068392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994086,0.0000540664,0.00003478742,0.00009046175,0.0003765087,0.00003556669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996108,0.00008230167,0.00009071099,0.00004983943,0.0001470189,0.00001927078],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005667427,0.0001839037,0.0009834927,0.0004969267,0.00003241967,0.0003796714,0.0002440375,0.1116319,0.6819193,0.004256226,0.0008748666,0.1984305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000217365,0.002633781,0.003020369,0.00003106608,0.00003799673,0.0004962753,0.00003885975,0.674633,0.3106797,0.001028903,0.007125662,0.00005705617],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2113847,0.0006349114,0.782925,0.000261669,0.0001602553,0.0002148147,0.00009651673,0.002013505,0.002308623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524643,0.0001047721,0.04642881,0.0000540946,0.00001365803,0.0000651395,0.00003363965,0.00001650872,0.0008190925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001837763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003654182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008733235202322383,"score_gpt":0.1968728277825368,"score_spread":0.1881395925802145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}