{"id":"W2152667044","doi":"10.1109/nafips.2004.1337410","title":"Estimating outlier impact on FastICA using fuzzy inference","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing NAFIPS '04.","topic":"Blind Source Separation Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"FastICA; Outlier; Independent component analysis; Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Pattern recognition (psychology); Artificial intelligence; Estimator; Anomaly detection; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Algorithm; Blind signal separation; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001368908,0.0003915065,0.0003760194,0.0004029201,0.0007165901,0.0006385039,0.001567021,0.0001892434,0.000001976192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001154798,0.0002898776,0.0001755531,0.001273318,0.0001718053,0.004908451,0.0002349311,0.0004982336,0.00004118546],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002945116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001013102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001692236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003512956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969231,0.0001358487,0.001117195,0.0003083749,0.0009749387,0.0005405401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966583,0.0001804394,0.001263196,0.000746407,0.001014605,0.0001370726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003917778,0.0001370085,0.0005969045,0.0002083652,0.00003948219,0.00000134648,0.02765374,0.9413976,0.0007979883,0.004411662,0.001094069,0.02362265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003924566,0.00132261,0.006523722,0.008018355,0.0001785574,0.0002470113,0.002499429,0.7576845,0.1184873,0.09668673,0.001311987,0.003115228],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2655098,0.0001142926,0.724712,0.0009899118,0.0007030856,0.0006016432,0.0000376834,0.0007472088,0.00658438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8433259,0.000002112077,0.155764,0.0007413032,0.0001071773,0.00001434698,0.000005171967,0.00001944768,0.00002053949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5778161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01890186467936393,"score_gpt":0.3021257628944508,"score_spread":0.2832238982150868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}