{"id":"W2152667044","doi":"10.1109/nafips.2004.1337410","title":"Estimating outlier impact on FastICA using fuzzy inference","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing NAFIPS '04.","topic":"Blind Source Separation Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"FastICA; Outlier; Independent component analysis; Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Pattern recognition (psychology); Artificial intelligence; Estimator; Anomaly detection; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Algorithm; Blind signal separation; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002804716,0.000719218,0.0006446658,0.001233672,0.0005922556,0.001242872,0.0005075952,0.0008664436,0.0004933068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01511209,0.0003282909,0.0006839891,0.0006737421,0.0007552476,0.001222765,0.0006326236,0.0009353546,0.0001273586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009777918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009701262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005961083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003817015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989296,0.0002416269,0.00009061641,0.0001685141,0.000484203,0.00008553272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928256,0.005408044,0.0004542156,0.0002762997,0.0009703314,0.00006543022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005246504,0.0000772721,0.003850953,0.0001326347,0.0001127338,0.0002084517,0.000276539,0.7773741,0.02674839,0.0049524,0.0001826286,0.1855593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009224237,0.00006867098,0.001973537,0.000009986075,0.00001930661,0.00005873835,0.00002180848,0.9849807,0.01025183,0.002446559,0.0001399873,0.00001954511],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1347812,0.0001822777,0.8636762,0.00009001792,0.00001736853,0.00003698089,0.00002548968,0.0002802594,0.0009101872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8379408,0.0001683839,0.1612732,0.00003583299,0.00001565516,0.0000398382,0.00005037288,0.00003027431,0.0004457549],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005961083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01483291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01890186467936393,"score_gpt":0.3021257628944508,"score_spread":0.2832238982150868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}