{"id":"W2152684625","doi":"","title":"Large elections with multiple alternatives: a Condorcet Jury Theorem and inefficient equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Private information retrieval; State (computer science); Jury; Economics; Microeconomics; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Voting; Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Computer security; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01679088,0.0007765859,0.002996294,0.001445559,0.002593828,0.005617964,0.003131168,0.003103388,0.01038542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0646568,0.0007833745,0.001964109,0.001943846,0.00483746,0.008851633,0.003433315,0.004455946,0.00116277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002727896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002275379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001808664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001593072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864743,0.007931666,0.0005779904,0.001789886,0.00186366,0.001362431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9365782,0.04590457,0.007682203,0.006369471,0.002109753,0.001355837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006502729,0.00005312493,0.0008187537,0.00005346001,0.00005294759,0.00009923889,0.0002068788,0.01878036,0.0003277816,0.9715865,0.001448192,0.006507761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007598671,0.00001781289,0.0002646355,0.00001874212,0.00001550663,0.00003839623,0.00004647979,0.06931842,0.0001840325,0.9290097,0.0009944254,0.00001589548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2342966,0.0007405326,0.6938404,0.007756317,0.0001317361,0.0003050786,0.0004005094,0.0001507113,0.06237808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.915001,0.0004944557,0.07015742,0.0005487427,0.0002711345,0.0005345861,0.0002094897,0.0001037637,0.01267939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01679088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08879972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.035991428376916,"score_gpt":0.242141323112347,"score_spread":0.2061498947354309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}