{"id":"W2152684625","doi":"","title":"Large elections with multiple alternatives: a Condorcet Jury Theorem and inefficient equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Private information retrieval; State (computer science); Jury; Economics; Microeconomics; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Voting; Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Computer security; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002157995,0.0003880188,0.0006991237,0.0003516689,0.0001626837,0.00518814,0.000720437,0.0001666208,0.0001425606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002630667,0.0003564959,0.00009582276,0.0002457846,0.0001896361,0.002200246,0.001639024,0.0003451034,0.000232431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003453926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005086788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007759868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001173791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980398,0.00002601536,0.000615522,0.0008118253,0.00006253826,0.0004442495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985698,0.000216114,0.0004716346,0.0005045289,0.00004984518,0.0001881061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111039,0.0001771173,0.1240495,0.0002912205,0.0002216569,0.000004828048,0.002731893,0.0003290804,0.000005227111,0.8705205,0.001253971,0.0003039925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003114513,0.0007680425,0.0754626,0.001345119,0.00004693054,0.00004559043,0.00186762,0.01568143,0.000988561,0.7374122,0.1596861,0.003581259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9381036,0.001036824,0.007886644,0.000343483,0.0004970125,0.0009228297,0.001781456,0.0002077095,0.04922041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965969,0.00001745836,0.0001499032,0.0002530006,0.0002063085,0.0002266034,0.0001634161,0.00006681948,0.002319642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1584321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.035991428376916,"score_gpt":0.242141323112347,"score_spread":0.2061498947354309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}