{"id":"W2152791982","doi":"10.1139/l03-098","title":"Unit of analysis in conventional trip generation modelling: an investigation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Transportation Planning and Optimization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Trip generation; Unit (ring theory); TRIPS architecture; Travel behavior; Demand forecasting; Trip distribution; Transport engineering; Survey data collection; Estimation; Sampling (signal processing); Time-use survey; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Operations research; Engineering; Work (physics); Economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01828258,0.0005256535,0.00157164,0.001189802,0.001170207,0.003469658,0.002188301,0.001192231,0.00253801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09519111,0.0005925272,0.001095363,0.003049983,0.001636266,0.003793538,0.002205596,0.001579724,0.0005026166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001559915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001455068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007177021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003836591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868346,0.009104437,0.0005128284,0.0009933059,0.002170555,0.0003843611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8856627,0.09903022,0.004223103,0.004307727,0.006264467,0.0005118062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001611892,0.0005527362,0.2606328,0.001502723,0.0006003352,0.001090223,0.006571732,0.1718009,0.002054939,0.2519547,0.004982878,0.2966442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001365981,0.001334042,0.07913924,0.0007595888,0.0006253764,0.000925565,0.00621779,0.785877,0.005882371,0.09546313,0.02343403,0.0002053076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4107634,0.003560579,0.5632145,0.001217465,0.0003568206,0.0005490509,0.0004381696,0.0002527555,0.01964736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393927,0.0008816225,0.05789064,0.0001108264,0.0001441406,0.0002466661,0.0002176312,0.000107881,0.001007969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09668869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03552326278766574,"score_gpt":0.2394964057027914,"score_spread":0.2039731429151257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}