{"id":"W2153009398","doi":"10.5558/tfc86354-3","title":"Negative or positive effects of plantation and intensive forestry on biodiversity: A matter of scale and perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Quebec Intensive Silviculture Network; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Zoning; Biodiversity; Forest management; Intact forest landscape; Threatened species; Ecoforestry; Forest ecology; Environmental resource management; Geography; Land use; Forest restoration; Agroforestry; Sustainable forest management; Habitat; Ecosystem; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004924173,0.0004921901,0.0008288817,0.002352971,0.0008890586,0.004917503,0.00111151,0.001623128,0.004568975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009575259,0.0001729989,0.0008182965,0.002200681,0.006119468,0.004671151,0.00189286,0.002335963,0.00034493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00181891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001074826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005037253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007729403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977247,0.0009503159,0.0001822259,0.000421886,0.0005908529,0.0001299843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986336,0.01012063,0.001217723,0.0004529104,0.001578968,0.0002937004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003620654,0.0001790567,0.1053944,0.01356336,0.001268343,0.00165168,0.01024884,0.003412026,0.006683532,0.2273674,0.03129596,0.5985734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005455545,0.0005717305,0.3970285,0.01899338,0.001226231,0.002002908,0.02759568,0.001834888,0.002728149,0.218474,0.3292013,0.0002887051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1258929,0.5511212,0.01857237,0.1756286,0.008450362,0.0001755784,0.001571443,0.0001571692,0.1184304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7273363,0.2250697,0.009685167,0.02345333,0.008395325,0.0001454224,0.0003697542,0.0001316317,0.005413373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005037253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02604187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005275883170760951,"score_gpt":0.22131649180007,"score_spread":0.2160406086293091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}