{"id":"W2153095844","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2006.07.007","title":"Analyzing Cortical Bone Cross-Sectional Geometry by Peripheral QCT: Comparison With Bone Histomorphometry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","topic":"Bone health and osteoporosis research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Quantitative computed tomography; Cortical bone; Tibia; Medicine; Cadaver; Densitometry; Peripheral; Geometry; Bone mineral; Biomedical engineering; Nuclear medicine; Anatomy; Mathematics; Osteoporosis; Pathology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001784025,0.0005557503,0.0007532103,0.001341454,0.0004722272,0.0007547285,0.0007831566,0.0006981575,0.003915761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003100639,0.0007518994,0.000287608,0.001762402,0.0006569909,0.0004590488,0.0004452059,0.0004038964,0.0005115311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002936107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005314309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00568625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008201079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988953,0.0002701656,0.00005755438,0.0001820655,0.000544523,0.00005041322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967282,0.001439312,0.0003078068,0.0005156649,0.0009204589,0.00008853355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004328894,0.0001894391,0.1195871,0.0004730546,0.0002227069,0.0003622246,0.0006829093,0.002755919,0.7643428,0.0005410424,0.0004459514,0.1060679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001949187,0.0008771841,0.711705,0.00003157018,0.000564168,0.006317961,0.0004741038,0.03453964,0.2426784,0.0006388741,0.001892117,0.00008604824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9205766,0.001187602,0.07384726,0.00009042935,0.0000292045,0.0001193172,0.0008093984,0.0007423332,0.002597815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967944,0.0003366048,0.0302982,0.00006619097,0.00001507308,0.00005472811,0.0001888119,0.0002025165,0.0008938827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00568625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01309949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07071493276450008,"score_gpt":0.464048198562534,"score_spread":0.3933332657980339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}