{"id":"W2153155317","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2010.12.018","title":"A model of job satisfaction for collaborative development processes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems and Software","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Job satisfaction; Agile software development; Job design; Computer science; Knowledge management; Extreme programming; Job attitude; Sustainability; Software development; Work (physics); Job analysis; Pair programming; Job performance; Software development process; Software; Psychology; Engineering; Software engineering; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00410182,0.001249402,0.001031816,0.001900169,0.001682387,0.003935762,0.003742289,0.003456137,0.0124954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01257347,0.0008061738,0.00151355,0.002154984,0.002930939,0.004433083,0.002129629,0.002290936,0.002483766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003786708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003126252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01791863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008610723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958477,0.002130198,0.0001510852,0.0005210717,0.0006171067,0.000732791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911061,0.005998282,0.0006214411,0.00044092,0.001201777,0.0006313707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004366736,0.001080811,0.02107098,0.0003606701,0.0002929259,0.0006399947,0.005272508,0.4330967,0.002056124,0.4792673,0.005678354,0.05074699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007594655,0.0002686509,0.00725176,0.00005819483,0.0000837824,0.0001369937,0.0009763145,0.9052131,0.0001892192,0.08353702,0.002140794,0.0000681813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2163061,0.0006288073,0.7142494,0.005293225,0.0001764538,0.0004565254,0.0006320832,0.0007307811,0.06152659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676331,0.0001913386,0.0220362,0.0001554755,0.00005450311,0.0003236551,0.0001961293,0.00007183757,0.009337768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01791863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04180127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02750157553542526,"score_gpt":0.2656077780506239,"score_spread":0.2381062025151987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}