{"id":"W2153155317","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2010.12.018","title":"A model of job satisfaction for collaborative development processes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems and Software","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Job satisfaction; Agile software development; Job design; Computer science; Knowledge management; Extreme programming; Job attitude; Sustainability; Software development; Work (physics); Job analysis; Pair programming; Job performance; Software development process; Software; Psychology; Engineering; Software engineering; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004225439,0.0000681654,0.0001751691,0.00008365716,0.000055264,0.00007755154,0.0001491148,0.00005541766,3.73951e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000369428,0.00005188762,0.00002123801,0.0001273577,0.00001126986,0.0005184066,0.00001974251,0.0001078482,8.526845e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001154457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002944804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008511319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001256588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993834,0.000009766203,0.0003040425,0.0000747997,0.0001553691,0.00007256219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985029,0.0002402313,0.0003956568,0.00008889529,0.0007240023,0.00004831619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005312571,0.0004074682,0.257647,0.01515595,0.001163424,0.0000485626,0.05149696,0.04410337,0.04665128,0.07699388,0.01340803,0.4923928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01172887,0.008213622,0.1371557,0.009215377,0.0005433426,0.00437857,0.004427312,0.3899556,0.1279173,0.03942192,0.261856,0.005186351],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1497865,0.0005145904,0.8491933,0.00004236101,0.0003025958,0.0001168747,0.00000376276,0.0000329918,0.000007010083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5803404,0.00004119376,0.4195485,0.000004980433,0.00003599914,0.000008591971,1.0971e-7,0.000003645998,0.00001659681],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4872065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2115916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02750157553542526,"score_gpt":0.2656077780506239,"score_spread":0.2381062025151987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}