{"id":"W2153258642","doi":"10.1177/0265407510378123","title":"Relational efficacy beliefs and relationship quality within coach-athlete dyads","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","topic":"Sport Psychology and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Dyad; Psychology; Complementarity (molecular biology); Social psychology; Perception; Partner effects; Athletes; Quality (philosophy); Self-efficacy; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002869667,0.0002430444,0.0004621566,0.001382585,0.001077596,0.001648044,0.0003159031,0.0003573823,0.002070484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105001,0.0002317945,0.0002094161,0.0004967398,0.000838656,0.0006044342,0.001379369,0.00108544,0.0001586772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003224316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002732518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001847393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00378572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985959,0.0006869112,0.00009095248,0.0001727605,0.0002928773,0.0001606821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914762,0.003802843,0.002296017,0.0005169267,0.0007358892,0.001172121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001097807,0.0004493652,0.9853301,0.00002967783,0.000101468,0.0001273837,0.006371045,0.00009441556,0.0008353037,0.0003110567,0.00006604867,0.00617439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005838567,0.0001774642,0.9915087,0.00001384908,0.0000321025,0.0001806873,0.0071633,0.000332387,0.0001696349,0.0001957026,0.0002125156,0.00000779542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991467,0.00005388963,0.0001313719,0.00001774253,0.000001972538,0.000006005866,0.00001044144,0.000001051077,0.0006307127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997519,0.00003865949,0.00006693714,0.000004602622,0.000002101727,0.00000695125,0.00001980276,7.511116e-7,0.0001082173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002869667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01517642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1665515059271688,"score_gpt":0.3867980885651778,"score_spread":0.220246582638009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}