{"id":"W2153267599","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cps082","title":"Economic evaluation of research to improve the Canadian forest fire danger rating system","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Damages; Investment (military); Business; Net present value; Natural resource economics; Distribution (mathematics); Wildfire suppression; Environmental resource management; Economic evaluation; Fire protection; Cost–benefit analysis; Social benefits; Environmental economics; Economics; Engineering; Production (economics); Political science; Quality (philosophy)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03046398,0.0001440497,0.0002103214,0.000499167,0.0004853228,0.0002303742,0.001882572,0.0001364314,0.0004480271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001649565,0.0001062036,0.0001091712,0.0004005696,0.0003696899,0.001193639,0.0003531711,0.0008801167,0.0004634501],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004910594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006983627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1641138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2264599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925301,0.001471597,0.0007023205,0.0002475923,0.004215322,0.0008330673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967051,0.0007217002,0.0003024866,0.0004941033,0.001112188,0.0006644559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001465627,0.0001067445,0.9632037,0.00003441325,0.00009028926,0.00002338536,0.001513662,0.01723688,0.0005937665,0.003328439,0.003381231,0.01034099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006594,0.0006530072,0.9122515,0.0002946521,0.00001991537,0.0002259791,0.001311887,0.07769801,0.001240646,0.0006651815,0.004816826,0.0001629347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895422,0.00006768393,0.00002161043,0.0007315219,0.001411329,0.0008022651,0.00003419785,0.000006368688,0.007382793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979958,0.000003903604,0.0001985182,0.00001928537,0.001517201,0.00008207833,0.00001055007,0.00002788184,0.0001448173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0623461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0670853556703787,"score_gpt":0.3954891355511049,"score_spread":0.3284037798807262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}