{"id":"W2153267599","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cps082","title":"Economic evaluation of research to improve the Canadian forest fire danger rating system","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Damages; Investment (military); Business; Net present value; Natural resource economics; Distribution (mathematics); Wildfire suppression; Environmental resource management; Economic evaluation; Fire protection; Cost–benefit analysis; Social benefits; Environmental economics; Economics; Engineering; Production (economics); Political science; Quality (philosophy)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08273969,0.001182529,0.001271199,0.006381832,0.001676068,0.004783707,0.002304638,0.001585652,0.003640164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1562301,0.0004602368,0.00193513,0.007483612,0.001653564,0.002145651,0.002050674,0.001548692,0.0001924243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07529909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1023209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6198773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7068266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8892205,0.06023369,0.00447952,0.001445345,0.04011131,0.004509516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8451637,0.08109065,0.00755262,0.004181406,0.05807048,0.003941133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02188033,0.002508079,0.1227728,0.007100556,0.003031416,0.0005806184,0.0007324202,0.2934535,0.004482128,0.09677961,0.02962834,0.4170502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008058215,0.0191357,0.4335509,0.004240735,0.007639578,0.0004248217,0.002892578,0.3475131,0.007297339,0.02600084,0.1423909,0.0008553453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5800202,0.01892516,0.02362946,0.015055,0.000676083,0.02356501,0.01765642,0.0002821758,0.3201904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9473127,0.00376977,0.03815229,0.001073375,0.00009174936,0.002544291,0.002858974,0.00001900002,0.004178027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3801227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7647227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0670853556703787,"score_gpt":0.3954891355511049,"score_spread":0.3284037798807262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}