{"id":"W2153379120","doi":"10.1002/smll.200900626","title":"In vivo Quantum‐Dot Toxicity Assessment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small","topic":"Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":427,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics; Hospital for Sick Children; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Biodistribution; Toxicity; In vivo; Quantum dot; Nanotechnology; Chemistry; Biophysics; In vitro; Toxicology; Pharmacology; Materials science; Biochemistry; Biology; Organic chemistry; Biotechnology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005073252,0.0001077814,0.0001739016,0.00004838652,0.00005895757,0.00007201124,0.000215615,0.00004936799,0.00195244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003733707,0.00008208845,0.00003753546,0.00007581461,0.00003405377,0.0001403609,0.00002923525,0.0000753221,0.0001996973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004794808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004581927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001575391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001196702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999047,0.0000929079,0.0002151958,0.0002247471,0.000149372,0.0002708026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996141,0.00004219237,0.00004809433,0.000223351,0.00002036375,0.00005185559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018762,0.000106389,0.000353579,0.000007260468,8.434925e-7,0.00001292205,0.0001593106,0.0000230831,0.9844713,0.01284482,0.001143033,0.0008587177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002435673,0.0002441733,0.01462509,0.00004707183,0.000004967877,0.000006225073,0.0000935348,0.000769965,0.9592739,0.009096232,0.01534605,0.0002492287],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850819,0.0001488128,0.00008409521,0.00173807,0.0002689764,0.000100166,0.000005926684,0.00005053924,0.01252151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970667,0.00002765122,0.00127164,0.0009589643,0.00008672786,0.000007528217,3.29102e-7,0.000006392215,0.0005740194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02519738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03710292723049297,"score_gpt":0.2776057031054169,"score_spread":0.2405027758749239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}