{"id":"W2153384744","doi":"10.1177/1740774506075667","title":"One relative risk versus two odds ratios: implications for meta-analyses involving paired and unpaired binary data","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Trials","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odds ratio; Relative risk; Meta-analysis; Odds; Statistics; Pooling; Contrast (vision); Diagnostic odds ratio; Confidence interval; Medicine; Logistic regression; Mathematics; Internal medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4620361,0.004489706,0.01768833,0.009766946,0.001503841,0.007743862,0.008119727,0.01056719,0.003651289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7369903,0.002433276,0.01933693,0.01055646,0.01025713,0.01252278,0.00433042,0.01749029,0.0006647776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003921959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003287789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000845467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009648808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2481434,0.6963999,0.02077203,0.01363795,0.02034722,0.0006994752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.185974,0.7720211,0.01573734,0.02142986,0.004132066,0.0007055947],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0192016,0.0004178295,0.01772459,0.07748707,0.125795,0.002604723,0.003983286,0.01975443,0.001814066,0.3145659,0.02347838,0.3931732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007408014,0.003468388,0.00559291,0.01392174,0.05156228,0.00220616,0.0007051899,0.03520762,0.002423008,0.8587926,0.01800103,0.0007110069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01290594,0.1090402,0.8350416,0.02681656,0.008439763,0.002735555,0.000811085,0.0008500503,0.003359261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2462261,0.01587562,0.7078251,0.01524253,0.005172123,0.008070451,0.0002382899,0.0003981736,0.0009516078],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5379639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6634053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9940942495411971,"score_gpt":0.7671393654451276,"score_spread":0.2269548840960695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}