{"id":"W2153426534","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpq012","title":"An urn model for species richness estimation in quadrat sampling from fixed-area populations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Taiwan Forestry Research Institute; National Taiwan University; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Quadrat; Statistics; Species richness; Mathematics; Resampling; Estimator; Sampling (signal processing); Confidence interval; Ecology; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00113583,0.000103768,0.0001454566,0.0003352229,0.0002648367,0.0001146167,0.000713923,0.0001216649,0.000260638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006249709,0.00009459917,0.00006468541,0.0001996818,0.0002609538,0.00129954,0.0001020201,0.0005878312,0.00001348585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001734658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007082727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001732432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01004497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983683,0.00007447822,0.0004478255,0.0002055557,0.000650638,0.0002531724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988792,0.000334454,0.0001927448,0.0001741021,0.0003010583,0.0001184516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009503034,0.0001523306,0.6034848,0.000001550953,0.00001252218,0.000005651706,0.0004910853,0.3836443,0.0005988095,0.01111275,0.00004549766,0.0003556563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002646452,0.00007774322,0.4836237,0.00001059629,0.000003321286,0.000007501162,0.0001241005,0.439357,0.00003160393,0.07641339,0.0000352726,0.00005119243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9002889,0.000005356262,0.09818833,0.0004414346,0.0004368948,0.0001497033,0.00005327259,0.000007642931,0.0004285164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585685,0.00001074238,0.04089223,0.00002692979,0.0001799976,0.00002494568,0.0001197784,0.0000115936,0.0001653302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1198611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5605329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1176657322993197,"score_gpt":0.4220037422260197,"score_spread":0.3043380099266999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}