{"id":"W2153426534","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpq012","title":"An urn model for species richness estimation in quadrat sampling from fixed-area populations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Taiwan Forestry Research Institute; National Taiwan University; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Quadrat; Statistics; Species richness; Mathematics; Resampling; Estimator; Sampling (signal processing); Confidence interval; Ecology; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01408697,0.0008926547,0.002385269,0.001284828,0.000531444,0.001136096,0.00516713,0.001602314,0.001928432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0287926,0.001010853,0.00170416,0.00144825,0.001388393,0.002569919,0.001366102,0.001841359,0.000839982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00166436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009504682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01262695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009084436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937959,0.003649546,0.0002308492,0.001271676,0.0007560936,0.0002958938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839199,0.0118462,0.001070537,0.001435924,0.001516488,0.000210921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000213816,0.00008431682,0.006145156,0.000150648,0.0002071763,0.0001731896,0.0002970167,0.8849502,0.001626438,0.04849996,0.001047614,0.0566044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001059561,0.00003478882,0.0006099564,0.000009809064,0.00001431828,0.0000467245,0.000008279888,0.991276,0.00017273,0.007387565,0.0004128298,0.00001625139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01336526,0.000152438,0.9852374,0.00007141654,0.00002957702,0.0001061965,0.0001489951,0.0003503821,0.000538329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3874246,0.0004905117,0.6021761,0.0003505997,0.0001193253,0.001550113,0.001397948,0.0002657895,0.006225007],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01408697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07449985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1176657322993197,"score_gpt":0.4220037422260197,"score_spread":0.3043380099266999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}