{"id":"W2153454213","doi":"10.1002/ajim.22022","title":"Preserving workers' dignity in workers' compensation systems: An international perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"American Journal of Industrial Medicine","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto","keywords":"Dignity; Compensation (psychology); Workers' compensation; Adversarial system; Equity (law); Medicine; Actuarial science; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Law; Business; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160902,0.0003922079,0.0003965909,0.002683912,0.005527938,0.01081365,0.001203915,0.003826328,0.004247458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009196556,0.0001766902,0.0003036512,0.002904311,0.02621592,0.007419788,0.004483738,0.00352213,0.0002928506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01343779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01114175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01909909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01795533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933923,0.002783472,0.0003167186,0.0005414783,0.001379771,0.001586243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921028,0.004582071,0.001093167,0.0004640473,0.001100895,0.0006571493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002888047,0.00007011376,0.004229679,0.0002821588,0.00001530797,0.0001977207,0.0192742,0.000643873,0.0002567973,0.9124089,0.003759939,0.0588324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002886882,0.0004708803,0.03959744,0.005490036,0.00008969967,0.0008892747,0.07151612,0.0007602479,0.00131563,0.5120326,0.3677017,0.0001075274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.09803047,0.1418489,0.007000924,0.1825311,0.001364193,0.0000690343,0.0001018511,0.00002627027,0.5690274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433228,0.04167484,0.001425289,0.005001764,0.001014829,0.00005220334,0.00003119866,0.00001094108,0.007466037],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01909909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09749848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3558791445270851,"score_gpt":0.5536337237068469,"score_spread":0.1977545791797619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}