{"id":"W2153454213","doi":"10.1002/ajim.22022","title":"Preserving workers' dignity in workers' compensation systems: An international perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"American Journal of Industrial Medicine","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto","keywords":"Dignity; Compensation (psychology); Workers' compensation; Adversarial system; Equity (law); Medicine; Actuarial science; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Law; Business; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007651226,0.0003894603,0.002701787,0.001326784,0.0002739337,0.00001542141,0.0009167925,0.0005082623,0.0006582531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004842019,0.0002699567,0.0002029562,0.001363283,0.0003640242,0.0005209695,0.0001441275,0.005239116,0.00005230008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002875125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004582509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008091896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001613082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888668,0.005657191,0.002997537,0.0003183104,0.00138635,0.0007738348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987836,0.00553438,0.004046555,0.0003854987,0.001392914,0.0008046392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008331883,0.0001379973,0.06725462,0.0007809965,0.0002117027,0.00002999456,0.001758339,0.000009484065,4.229139e-8,0.0002531045,0.001574605,0.9271559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003619032,0.002026275,0.005355769,0.1271621,0.0005238544,0.0000893899,0.05226526,0.0000318442,8.510741e-9,0.00002895378,0.8085014,0.000396156],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001127884,0.9765083,0.00008681366,0.002059007,0.01010686,0.002924639,0.00006486055,0.00002304098,0.007098612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01196687,0.9646586,0.0001262579,0.0001103934,0.02257549,0.0001494539,0.0001341101,0.00007210733,0.0002067393],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9267598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3558791445270851,"score_gpt":0.5536337237068469,"score_spread":0.1977545791797619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}