{"id":"W2153517030","doi":"10.1139/f05-220","title":"Development and use of the Wetland Fish Index to assess the quality of coastal wetlands in the Laurentian Great Lakes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Innovation Trust; University of Toronto; Michigan State University; Great Lakes Fishery Commission; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Wetland; Bay; Marsh; Water quality; Environmental science; Species richness; Index of biological integrity; Habitat; Ecology; Hydrology (agriculture); Diversity index; Fishery; Geography; Biology; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001024564,0.000323879,0.0001811543,0.001974216,0.0002739026,0.0006708846,0.0002370813,0.0001155354,0.0003251049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001646825,0.0001057052,0.0001713541,0.0009655512,0.0002730362,0.0004134326,0.0003059793,0.000147094,0.00008815627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009678777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001388886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0992113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1643828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997005,0.00006577236,0.00002352437,0.00005963827,0.0001234456,0.00002709692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991488,0.0001142871,0.0001938931,0.00005073686,0.0003593323,0.0001328234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004507284,0.00004323924,0.9342448,0.00002118964,0.00005528632,0.00003946209,0.0002452161,0.0007501424,0.001982476,0.0001043562,0.0004405305,0.06202816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005691575,0.00009827498,0.9949329,0.000005454015,0.00001171293,0.00004229516,0.0001481207,0.003309544,0.0005731047,0.00005091836,0.0008119263,0.000009922951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946307,0.0001563286,0.00227327,0.00005525388,0.000005927047,0.00006467217,0.0006615619,0.0000449141,0.002107272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813113,0.0001610341,0.01658922,0.0000199744,0.00001000856,0.0000998397,0.001093118,0.0000107919,0.0007047303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9007887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1972677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03729068754535372,"score_gpt":0.237833783941076,"score_spread":0.2005430963957223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}