{"id":"W2153630487","doi":"10.1109/tpwrd.2005.852341","title":"A Resistance Sign-Based Method for Voltage Sag Source Detection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","topic":"Power Quality and Harmonics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voltage sag; Robustness (evolution); Electrical impedance; Voltage; Disturbance (geology); Engineering; Disturbance voltage; Troubleshooting; Electronic engineering; Power quality; AC power; Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Electrical engineering; Voltage optimisation; Reliability engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002772049,0.0002148293,0.0001959993,0.0001453588,0.0002006449,0.00004116004,0.0001357563,0.0001647031,0.0001406245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005025559,0.0002499749,0.0002246556,0.0002061242,0.00002730049,0.0001929986,3.850702e-7,0.0002965449,0.00009614475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002101902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003119134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001274433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003826715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989027,0.00004304169,0.0002828036,0.0002613785,0.0001822988,0.0003278099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992005,0.0002985899,0.00003401751,0.0003012568,0.00006319482,0.0001024588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004043779,0.0002011717,3.453612e-7,0.0001308523,0.0001427524,0.000002688357,0.0006342413,0.7955533,0.08096576,0.00003310723,0.002153488,0.1197779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001063966,0.0001162062,0.00001329678,0.00004988425,0.00008890321,0.000002892752,0.00007997586,0.2967694,0.4489187,0.0000706266,0.252388,0.0004380886],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006996764,0.0002880646,0.9903519,0.0001337931,0.000645816,0.0002942982,0.0001176558,0.0006173128,0.0005543811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785954,0.00004769424,0.01927818,0.0004775259,0.00005380937,0.0001173084,0.00000303356,0.00006493686,0.001362112],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01627526173941642,"score_gpt":0.2444003450277619,"score_spread":0.2281250832883455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}