{"id":"W2153672555","doi":"10.1109/tec.2006.874233","title":"A Simplified Wind Power Generation Model for Reliability Evaluation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":586,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wind power; Wind speed; Turbine; Renewable energy; Reliability (semiconductor); Electric power system; Reliability engineering; Monte Carlo method; Electricity generation; Computer science; Engineering; Marine engineering; Meteorology; Power (physics); Electrical engineering; Aerospace engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003813106,0.0009846321,0.0009622932,0.0005954746,0.0003879463,0.0008759671,0.001550208,0.001148694,0.006690484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001791431,0.0004440073,0.0009425675,0.0009777974,0.0002975227,0.001336145,0.0005224508,0.001461819,0.002209645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005877043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009914199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00896868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008398816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996684,0.0001094525,0.00002063538,0.00004703096,0.0001261953,0.00002836085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996225,0.0001492514,0.00004381464,0.00005122211,0.0001176315,0.00001551385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002063954,0.00001457765,0.0001768394,0.00004446672,0.00001264026,0.00009499605,0.00002086404,0.9753268,0.0009555827,0.01196068,0.001444096,0.009927873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006377724,0.00001338262,0.00008525475,0.000005627887,0.000006576593,0.00002721343,0.000004358668,0.9940912,0.000128562,0.003805959,0.001820732,0.000004671693],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01070311,0.0004135165,0.9712619,0.0002150187,0.00008545529,0.0001419365,0.0009342292,0.0005676002,0.01567724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.662834,0.002528335,0.2830704,0.0002002878,0.000197331,0.001377885,0.003430626,0.0003917882,0.0459694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00896868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02238184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01718282201504666,"score_gpt":0.2201616292721756,"score_spread":0.202978807257129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}