{"id":"W2153731501","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2008.00908.x","title":"Taking ‘Big Government Conservatism’ Seriously? The Bush Presidency Reconsidered","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Presidency; Administration (probate law); Government (linguistics); Presidential system; Political science; Big government; Ideology; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000461372,0.0001353407,0.0001907749,0.00001082624,0.001829992,0.00006610141,0.0004455114,0.00008336565,0.0009287997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002734987,0.00008380652,0.0001247188,0.0000635582,0.001712689,0.0001134294,0.00002321483,0.0002251671,0.0004905271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002497857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002712092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01617866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004024936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978942,0.0003321167,0.0003112136,0.0002093193,0.0003552132,0.0008978947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998351,0.0008673636,0.00008345153,0.0003329401,0.00003154104,0.0003337283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001241555,0.00003866508,0.001427099,0.000004259224,0.0000224741,0.0000162941,0.01666233,2.828672e-7,0.00001466643,0.9702442,0.007239392,0.004317933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006254091,0.0003503922,0.067435,0.00004389615,0.00007787414,0.0001201359,0.03876401,0.0001044811,0.00008802519,0.521234,0.3705781,0.0005787411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6330216,0.0001399576,0.00006853617,0.07261929,0.0007040014,0.0002488578,0.00002477258,0.00008264707,0.2930903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832348,0.00001565625,0.00003902813,0.007097299,0.00084754,0.00002684063,6.816883e-7,0.00001055371,0.008727619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4490102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07335011854811861,"score_gpt":0.275875868410863,"score_spread":0.2025257498627444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}