{"id":"W2153779956","doi":"10.1016/j.jom.2009.01.002","title":"The effects of innovation–cost strategy, knowledge, and action in the supply chain on firm performance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Operations Management","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nexen (Canada)","funders":"Michigan State University","keywords":"Supply chain; Business; Industrial organization; Intellectual capital; Competitive advantage; Action (physics); Resource (disambiguation); Knowledge value chain; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Marketing; Organizational learning; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00555801,0.000272334,0.0003128567,0.001436202,0.0006700312,0.004089363,0.0004853642,0.001268327,0.005155723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04091562,0.0001638394,0.0003756509,0.002057325,0.002356883,0.003718012,0.00223258,0.001129885,0.0004488856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002024008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001786656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00408465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003441283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951717,0.002340353,0.0003200326,0.0004200336,0.0008028778,0.0009448708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8631214,0.1033959,0.01928002,0.002896703,0.005333239,0.005972768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006461287,0.001058509,0.9471722,0.0001022511,0.0003196075,0.0002787988,0.001178808,0.01880019,0.001204423,0.007088091,0.0002773815,0.02187358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004993176,0.0009741621,0.9396769,0.00009303532,0.0002004659,0.0001114775,0.00455638,0.03480935,0.00200632,0.01666344,0.0007867506,0.00007183263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961837,0.00008051223,0.0004296248,0.0001771552,0.000002991363,0.000009685918,0.00003239054,0.000005056466,0.003078816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998133,0.00001852231,0.00005320643,0.000006308939,0.000002335401,0.000002924384,0.00001345988,8.151936e-7,0.00008917268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00555801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02939391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02140624915864707,"score_gpt":0.2849627094904526,"score_spread":0.2635564603318055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}