{"id":"W2153779956","doi":"10.1016/j.jom.2009.01.002","title":"The effects of innovation–cost strategy, knowledge, and action in the supply chain on firm performance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Operations Management","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nexen (Canada)","funders":"Michigan State University","keywords":"Supply chain; Business; Industrial organization; Intellectual capital; Competitive advantage; Action (physics); Resource (disambiguation); Knowledge value chain; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Marketing; Organizational learning; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001034756,0.0000892322,0.00009651761,0.0004374137,0.0002562513,0.0003155252,0.0002370788,0.00002087149,0.000007585722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008600716,0.00005107107,0.0000234393,0.000866826,0.00002537283,0.0008485171,0.00002973244,0.0001440804,0.000006493496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003009391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002021523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000927917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004354474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991733,0.0000218721,0.0003957013,0.00006810071,0.0002164625,0.000124565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994043,0.00005066712,0.0002141763,0.0001233833,0.0002026255,0.000004840297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009812038,0.0005846022,0.003705056,0.0003135387,0.00007331084,0.000007026874,0.0004033467,0.001828045,0.0002897953,0.5756181,0.03600105,0.381078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002470848,0.0004794135,0.6930544,0.0004117983,0.0001092241,0.000008295037,0.001053135,0.009088746,0.0002696304,0.0034451,0.2893687,0.0002406849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.955352,0.0003955998,0.0001859471,0.01118882,0.0003400183,0.0006990711,3.807558e-7,0.000008251869,0.03182989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975127,0.000459296,0.00003417578,0.001105397,0.0004068034,0.00001588866,0.000003530364,0.00000386881,0.000458364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6893494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3042616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02140624915864707,"score_gpt":0.2849627094904526,"score_spread":0.2635564603318055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}