{"id":"W2153816399","doi":"10.1002/jts.20190","title":"A guide to economic evaluation: Methods for cost‐effectiveness analysis of person‐level data","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Traumatic Stress","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Economic analysis; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Economic evaluation; Health economics; Psychology; Cost–benefit analysis; Cost effectiveness; Public health; Clinical psychology; Public economics; Medicine; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Nursing; Political science; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08092896,0.005192739,0.006589582,0.01289921,0.0007568045,0.006026505,0.004860636,0.0054016,0.03678983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2155891,0.003671848,0.005728201,0.01273886,0.002737214,0.004525507,0.003482408,0.0116729,0.01381604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003618368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01054878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00308825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003917641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.924579,0.06088106,0.007549658,0.000843287,0.005804995,0.0003420832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7122225,0.2644888,0.005993554,0.006775064,0.009587267,0.0009328009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003400313,0.0003961594,0.0005893969,0.02149053,0.001818919,0.0003410117,0.000506635,0.01795569,0.0006157198,0.1933716,0.2970563,0.4655181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008278759,0.0004964631,0.001547786,0.02124985,0.000869274,0.0007401569,0.0003086993,0.03522201,0.001036428,0.3823969,0.5549606,0.0003438549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004210331,0.05703253,0.8976218,0.007820591,0.002289685,0.01157082,0.006983685,0.002492636,0.01376712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003466409,0.0305888,0.9285825,0.00166789,0.0006094837,0.02765562,0.001862108,0.0008876338,0.004679583],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.919071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4279984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8621715388444382,"score_gpt":0.65517443952132,"score_spread":0.2069970993231182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}