{"id":"W2153845225","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01542.x","title":"Reading comprehension in university students: relevance of PASS theory of intelligence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Reading (process); Comprehension; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Relevance (law); Linguistics; Mathematics education","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01051288,0.00008972607,0.0003622865,0.00138544,0.00003890069,0.00001011602,0.0005278951,0.00008962214,0.00006697509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005614907,0.00008055517,0.00006538109,0.0009977274,0.000161935,0.0003162983,0.0001464325,0.0007797214,0.000009558797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003316528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007086418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001075942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003531997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967127,0.001235946,0.0007169927,0.0001350078,0.0007423518,0.0004570195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965793,0.002370468,0.0003858477,0.0002148522,0.0003267909,0.0001227604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001220388,0.0006717212,0.9104789,0.0001578335,0.00008197539,0.000303436,0.02503996,0.00009982513,0.005315187,0.02101291,0.0002356339,0.0353822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001693477,0.0005828185,0.9247128,0.006750624,0.00001755637,0.000232029,0.04712757,0.00006374574,0.008817281,0.004583545,0.005160341,0.0002582033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936487,0.0006414213,0.000803274,0.00007460982,0.0003559413,0.0001182947,0.000001337954,0.000003076721,0.004353321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969397,0.0004303408,0.00191496,0.000005681206,0.00005491585,6.285206e-7,4.177055e-7,0.000009657173,0.0006437302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.035124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3643577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1171209748476314,"score_gpt":0.4492016235851022,"score_spread":0.3320806487374708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}