{"id":"W2153874890","doi":"10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2007)13:1(1)","title":"Quantifying Effectiveness of Cathodic Protection in Water Mains: Case Studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Infrastructure Systems","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cathodic protection; Mains electricity; Electricity; Environmental science; Forensic engineering; Engineering; Electrical engineering; Voltage; Anode","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003533491,0.001052374,0.0007259093,0.001896313,0.0009265323,0.001034908,0.002094182,0.002532,0.0017069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009123167,0.0005044201,0.001179555,0.002447464,0.00148493,0.001627307,0.001183763,0.001038035,0.0001659508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002833421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007925743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01289306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01805153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976856,0.001159667,0.0001174026,0.0002482825,0.00047642,0.0003126024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833371,0.01323655,0.00118534,0.0008743923,0.001090654,0.0002759349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001678632,0.004118672,0.09357183,0.001054638,0.000468606,0.004163355,0.002560636,0.8169802,0.01077564,0.01245733,0.001945296,0.05022519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005391559,0.01011104,0.05901251,0.0001873279,0.0004345418,0.001419237,0.00813065,0.8469574,0.05726822,0.009511006,0.006188478,0.0002405813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908833,0.0001813693,0.00620941,0.00007829281,0.000005946449,0.0001918378,0.0001781349,0.00002276921,0.002248951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943115,0.0001687623,0.004652772,0.000007700103,0.000004475132,0.00007610667,0.00008792314,0.000004720096,0.0006860479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01289306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02563602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0196985508329578,"score_gpt":0.2638252527567854,"score_spread":0.2441267019238276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}