{"id":"W2154003803","doi":"10.1002/nme.2745","title":"A continuum‐to‐atomistic bridging domain method for composite lattices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Army Research Office; Office of Naval Research","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Lagrange multiplier; Compatibility (geochemistry); Lattice (music); Domain decomposition methods; Displacement field; Composite number; Statistical physics; Internal energy; Coupling (piping); Physics; Mathematics; Finite element method; Classical mechanics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Materials science; Algorithm; Quantum mechanics; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002277131,0.0004430886,0.0007108795,0.000743833,0.00007535933,0.0002224732,0.0008284291,0.0001542909,0.00001346771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002160384,0.0004747045,0.0003446909,0.0005080873,0.00001316657,0.0002775168,0.0000542622,0.0006469422,0.000003904477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005329398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002040998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002493473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.857504e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973288,0.0001183297,0.0009932994,0.0003909783,0.000371034,0.000797604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965429,0.002523844,0.0001128089,0.0002172169,0.0002257108,0.0003775564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009609836,0.00004699392,0.00002626458,0.00005929196,0.000150051,0.00002412625,0.0002030776,0.6436744,0.1138792,0.001537349,0.0002407532,0.2400624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001252275,0.0001801066,0.0004424316,0.0002760875,0.00003700773,0.0002322234,0.00002891522,0.9294019,0.01681254,0.01016075,0.04053784,0.0006379645],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001646472,0.0002891454,0.9904588,0.0005972649,0.005819353,0.0006002488,0.00003230074,0.0003946174,0.0001618081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01768213,0.00001981625,0.9804385,0.0002926622,0.001233985,0.000168463,0.00000622026,0.0001271091,0.00003115326],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2857274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.019668155306411,"score_gpt":0.399542818262683,"score_spread":0.379874662956272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}