{"id":"W2154059982","doi":"","title":"Quilts of authorship: A literature review of multimodal assemblage in the field of literacy education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assemblage (archaeology); Quilt; Vignette; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Narrative; Literacy; Semiotics; Reading (process); Mediation; Citizen journalism; Social semiotics; Meaning-making; Epistemology; Linguistics; Social science; Psychology; Computer science; Visual arts; Social psychology; History; Art; Pedagogy; Archaeology; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005005758,0.0007147919,0.00227494,0.008763467,0.0008747294,0.003153393,0.0009121908,0.001575372,0.004374382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01512766,0.0005817536,0.0006430727,0.01125065,0.001821789,0.00627173,0.001716869,0.001508857,0.0007734062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001344588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005079261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004376432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973081,0.001321026,0.0004636155,0.0002430315,0.0005727743,0.00009136246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799923,0.01648215,0.00128424,0.0002588113,0.001798986,0.0001834841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005044106,0.00005097022,0.0006129604,0.06284226,0.0001182705,0.0002345599,0.002308764,0.0001151882,0.0002664945,0.005056815,0.007878231,0.920465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004358192,0.000271352,0.01144308,0.2355899,0.0008057088,0.002861437,0.01073073,0.0002180967,0.001050509,0.01072021,0.7261684,0.00009704304],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005646642,0.996917,0.0002200992,0.0005028865,0.00007698721,0.0000100722,0.00001108022,0.000004681855,0.001692498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007501529,0.9912521,0.0005393744,0.0002483373,0.00007065752,0.00002497559,0.00002302226,0.000003907111,0.0003360073],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008763467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02647334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2429633578986587,"score_gpt":0.5997445920206412,"score_spread":0.3567812341219825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}