{"id":"W2154245261","doi":"10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002488.x","title":"The Scientific Foundations of Habitat Conservation Plans: a Quantitative Assessment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Habitat; Population; Geography; Plan (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Scientific literature; Environmental planning; Computer science; Biology; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006971601,0.00008089458,0.0001115046,0.00004221751,0.0008366808,0.00002674002,0.0001605933,0.00006231235,0.0001935078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003901802,0.000060782,0.00003434747,0.0003605009,0.001456661,0.0001497902,0.00007756604,0.00007758739,0.0001072274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006776892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005004433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001421945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01390147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990445,0.0001797754,0.0003133554,0.0002087216,0.00009181994,0.0001618085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998434,0.001037933,0.0002265626,0.0001805871,0.00009847791,0.00002243536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001779681,0.00003519439,0.8786432,0.000001915143,0.00002163851,3.998791e-7,0.0002032782,0.0001222688,0.003758836,0.1141306,0.002595494,0.0004694439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002478848,0.0001087272,0.9136159,0.000004309695,0.0000123029,0.000003973789,0.0003783591,0.01612414,0.00004919762,0.02995994,0.03941528,0.00007998932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9645409,0.00005535485,0.01562022,0.01290279,0.00043989,0.0002576657,0.00001632289,0.0000260502,0.006140804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943182,0.00008973456,0.00351071,0.0007580843,0.000007943779,0.00007458578,0.0001071555,0.00000438934,0.001129163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08417066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.775735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04217001872971689,"score_gpt":0.3282921684007447,"score_spread":0.2861221496710278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}