{"id":"W2154245261","doi":"10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002488.x","title":"The Scientific Foundations of Habitat Conservation Plans: a Quantitative Assessment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Habitat; Population; Geography; Plan (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Scientific literature; Environmental planning; Computer science; Biology; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1126721,0.0005048051,0.0005074445,0.01944838,0.002932211,0.00599795,0.001624832,0.001072911,0.006812756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2873249,0.0005961785,0.0009543725,0.01118107,0.007282363,0.006735537,0.007256825,0.002186627,0.0003044466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008061606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01082581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004045114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003931185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8947682,0.05827823,0.008026912,0.002360305,0.03468394,0.001882415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4506228,0.3746596,0.07173363,0.0155642,0.08123363,0.006186134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005122479,0.0005849458,0.6410961,0.00280239,0.0005458618,0.0004235057,0.02491415,0.01667848,0.001566816,0.1090498,0.007559521,0.1942663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001394829,0.001373171,0.7424193,0.003155909,0.000393501,0.0005145423,0.07283005,0.04839945,0.002582284,0.06079455,0.06712638,0.0002714634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.818311,0.00211576,0.05265779,0.0109702,0.0001449044,0.003168326,0.00343809,0.000148277,0.1090457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819166,0.0003283863,0.01562527,0.0001538818,0.00005636414,0.000803767,0.0005273003,0.00001653473,0.0005718315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8873279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5958741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04217001872971689,"score_gpt":0.3282921684007447,"score_spread":0.2861221496710278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}