{"id":"W2154282371","doi":"10.1890/es12-00026.1","title":"Calculating long‐term fire frequency at the stand scale from charcoal data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosphere","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Charcoal; Environmental science; Fire regime; Radiocarbon dating; Physical geography; Fire history; Forestry; Pinus <genus>; Hydrology (agriculture); Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Geology; Ecosystem; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004665451,0.0001830975,0.0001662383,0.000002445824,0.0003236851,0.00005467423,0.0008079655,0.00008592629,0.03365336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005018754,0.0001293304,0.000044131,0.0001092001,0.000110237,0.0006881448,0.001025628,0.0001676629,0.01108204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002948288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008535786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004455268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009080999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983895,0.0001217658,0.0002240623,0.0004048176,0.0003590123,0.0005008641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998261,0.0001529704,0.000115475,0.0012962,0.000003242016,0.0001710986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005718224,0.00005125266,0.9130982,0.00001427749,0.0000186595,0.000007514236,0.0005493719,0.00002007792,0.002319494,0.000001936636,0.05864988,0.02526364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002483002,0.00002044027,0.9844393,0.00004794449,0.00002326164,0.00001327445,0.00005875147,0.004698801,0.0006794209,0.00002073125,0.009506098,0.0002436527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729125,0.002025786,0.00008006456,0.0001762825,0.0005799669,0.0003216835,0.0002471553,0.00006017811,0.02359634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966729,0.00001564484,0.0004508264,0.0001137981,0.0003839588,0.00001636867,0.0001299345,0.00003281515,0.002183719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07134115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01805033330908216,"score_gpt":0.2391307832342647,"score_spread":0.2210804499251826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}