{"id":"W2154298478","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.01.031","title":"Assessment of chemical dispersant effectiveness in a wave tank under regular non-breaking and breaking wave conditions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Pollution Bulletin","topic":"Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography","funders":"","keywords":"Dispersant; Breaking wave; Sea state; Environmental science; Dilution; Oil droplet; Petroleum; Dispersion (optics); Wave tank; Petroleum engineering; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Chemistry; Engineering; Oceanography; Chemical engineering; Geology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002668616,0.0001242059,0.0001725375,0.00007334309,0.0001075623,0.000009625029,0.00004180967,0.00007398627,0.001464369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003237891,0.0001244202,0.00004800555,0.000206426,0.0002604102,0.00005915295,0.0001652735,0.0001348389,0.00002009232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003280113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000128396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001180454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007983471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989954,0.00009183399,0.0002316942,0.0002757022,0.0002188243,0.0001865888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996429,0.0000532096,0.00009555007,0.0001324471,0.000011109,0.0000647956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001155354,0.0005749607,0.2060278,0.0001276838,0.00005053882,0.0000929442,0.0005598119,0.002954619,0.7705479,0.003658335,0.0004506769,0.0148392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008658661,0.00004708767,0.973647,0.00005727396,0.00001165656,0.0001457907,0.00006299851,0.005209383,0.01881909,0.0003392773,0.0006450607,0.0001495181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989612,0.000006265211,0.00190543,0.0005531064,0.00005684812,0.0002275438,0.000007093691,0.00002455553,0.007607195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986249,0.00001632414,0.001034979,0.0001218874,0.00001960665,0.00003399949,0.00001758623,0.00001133871,0.0001193807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7676192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009273756989592246,"score_gpt":0.2282067702665721,"score_spread":0.2189330132769799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}