{"id":"W2154298478","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.01.031","title":"Assessment of chemical dispersant effectiveness in a wave tank under regular non-breaking and breaking wave conditions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Pollution Bulletin","topic":"Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography","funders":"","keywords":"Dispersant; Breaking wave; Sea state; Environmental science; Dilution; Oil droplet; Petroleum; Dispersion (optics); Wave tank; Petroleum engineering; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Chemistry; Engineering; Oceanography; Chemical engineering; Geology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003871335,0.0002748737,0.0002570807,0.0002682139,0.0004256981,0.0005165164,0.0003347847,0.00045103,0.0008514451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005608468,0.00016215,0.0002619405,0.0001955674,0.0003189986,0.0004112457,0.0003062267,0.0002576018,0.000187818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005424814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007697366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01228151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997302,0.00003774221,0.00002976551,0.00005495697,0.0001021131,0.00004513861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929,0.000150982,0.00017177,0.00002911762,0.0002356141,0.0001224225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003092863,0.0002372129,0.01246279,0.00007070568,0.00002748902,0.00005523099,0.00008365224,0.001055832,0.978076,0.00003128128,0.00004045548,0.004766473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005415508,0.011437,0.03291182,0.000006812508,0.000129504,0.00005717086,0.0003302702,0.004330654,0.9501525,0.00002208921,0.0005514571,0.00001664916],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992471,0.00006172183,0.0002812168,0.00001223946,0.000003966696,0.0000178879,0.00006569653,0.000005747905,0.0003045812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962407,0.0001835471,0.001399825,0.00002005871,0.00000425255,0.00002298714,0.0001663686,0.000005334131,0.00195682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007697366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01530516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009273756989592246,"score_gpt":0.2282067702665721,"score_spread":0.2189330132769799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}