{"id":"W2154493507","doi":"10.1016/s0097-3165(03)00006-2","title":"Width and dual width of subsets in polynomial association schemes","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A","topic":"Finite Group Theory Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Association scheme; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Dual (grammatical number); Graph; Discrete mathematics; Polynomial; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002266602,0.0007032842,0.00136878,0.002774227,0.003198256,0.007813918,0.002334214,0.001527369,0.006953393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009104142,0.001424987,0.00132357,0.003494796,0.005674792,0.01703446,0.004887583,0.004259879,0.0006203378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001892545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007256078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009615967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008519434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983571,0.0003686079,0.0001373968,0.0004463391,0.0002956175,0.0003949553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930907,0.0037453,0.0007740724,0.0008876773,0.0004352132,0.001066887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002094574,0.00003236582,0.00102532,0.00003109864,0.000009821484,0.0000444773,0.0007944005,0.0008216472,0.0009186036,0.9920353,0.0003133419,0.003764165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003432347,0.00002407117,0.0004628078,0.00001846155,0.00003642349,0.0001111579,0.0004567085,0.004166037,0.0008454322,0.9924471,0.001377531,0.00001989358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8468094,0.0005549331,0.1253951,0.001271245,0.00009061332,0.00004499532,0.0005687977,0.0002396294,0.0250252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787595,0.0002581423,0.01474973,0.0001256047,0.000145638,0.00006065882,0.0003203883,0.00008774478,0.005492618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007813918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02326143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.022878052541248,"score_gpt":0.2962240398218491,"score_spread":0.2733459872806011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}