{"id":"W2154512326","doi":"10.1139/f10-026","title":"Modeling migratory energetics of Connecticut River American shad (Alosa sapidissima): implications for the conservation of an iteroparous anadromous fish","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alosa; Fish migration; Semelparity and iteroparity; Spawn (biology); Fecundity; Energetics; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Reproductive success; Reproduction; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003456782,0.0005667428,0.0003283319,0.0004682339,0.0007392322,0.0007240759,0.0009920397,0.0009181827,0.001513662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009709677,0.0005230019,0.0004498411,0.0004626022,0.0005671608,0.0005958106,0.0006265625,0.000464233,0.0000931438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001675689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001599638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1696776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2034047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999108,0.00004276305,0.000003630023,0.00002026156,0.000006607855,0.00001605318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999696,0.0001317104,0.00005867719,0.0000130649,0.00003717107,0.00006336177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003938893,0.00002196508,0.01267883,0.000005659258,0.000029158,0.00004748856,0.00002828795,0.985831,0.0002593543,0.0004424565,0.00009948256,0.0005169405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002620972,0.00004373958,0.00523312,0.000005639994,0.00002257511,0.00001839722,0.00008000556,0.9937019,0.00008924789,0.0006049945,0.000164206,0.000009893061],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933653,0.0000582197,0.004093905,0.0002930894,0.000008175701,0.00001714633,0.0002201984,0.0000262714,0.00191771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963315,0.00006113251,0.002208351,0.00003741655,0.000004829866,0.00003242496,0.0001638112,0.00001238165,0.001148207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1696776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3373799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01861333881779654,"score_gpt":0.2320410364325589,"score_spread":0.2134276976147624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}