{"id":"W2154576508","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.08.002","title":"Consumer response to uncertain promotions: An empirical analysis of conditional rebates","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Dartmouth College","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Receipt; Conditional probability; Conjoint analysis; Econometrics; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Marketing; Advertising; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Business; Preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Statistics; Financial economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01184381,0.0006856217,0.001404734,0.00081538,0.000468235,0.002102601,0.001943557,0.002676495,0.01243947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0775373,0.0006979972,0.001743875,0.000807052,0.001331345,0.002445196,0.001049561,0.004428956,0.001149125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001352046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006220056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004486791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003010728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969541,0.001531553,0.0001652299,0.0004847158,0.0004272223,0.0004372401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7460937,0.2300163,0.01322455,0.005860019,0.002748823,0.002056635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06904849,0.0110292,0.5270874,0.001546788,0.002253862,0.001151844,0.002143099,0.2666697,0.0145304,0.02554227,0.004991348,0.07400565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008071807,0.005256424,0.5422811,0.0001358601,0.001352579,0.0005298815,0.001107166,0.426468,0.003543315,0.01652989,0.001677146,0.0003114421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957112,0.000267561,0.001979789,0.0002131265,0.00001835334,0.00006932176,0.0002543059,0.00003851334,0.001447803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980551,0.00008271278,0.0005200469,0.00005981363,0.00002943385,0.00002727713,0.0003195869,0.00001782679,0.0008882888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01243947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06263685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3538285660671595,"score_gpt":0.5903400542026845,"score_spread":0.2365114881355251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}