{"id":"W2154696347","doi":"10.1177/1748895808088995","title":"Seeing private security like a state","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminology & Criminal Justice","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Private security; Agency (philosophy); Business; State (computer science); Statutory law; Corporate governance; Security studies; Critical security studies; Private sector; Public administration; Public relations; Security service; Information security; Computer security; Political science; Network security policy; Sociology; Law; Finance; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004567704,0.000184979,0.0002361806,0.0001434317,0.002087697,0.00005245651,0.0004201986,0.0001893182,0.0004254665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000464775,0.0001977364,0.00009388223,0.0001835919,0.00106492,0.000463094,0.0001151206,0.0004932986,0.0006254265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001161289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002920981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02392367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005102861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978315,0.0004087538,0.000280091,0.0003741277,0.0003102243,0.0007953117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986338,0.0004780574,0.0001531579,0.0003163398,0.0001559013,0.0002627231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001207713,0.0002492933,0.001996341,0.0002015684,0.00005580091,0.0002765016,0.9554512,0.00004878766,0.001020961,0.02751103,0.007139832,0.00592793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001059838,0.0004427539,0.05481742,0.00008589294,0.003508024,0.0007335273,0.2310593,0.0002877401,0.0003565389,0.004422116,0.701999,0.001227795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647615,0.0001433107,0.0004679284,0.001041759,0.001054592,0.0001551001,0.00001329055,0.000212877,0.03214963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912246,0.001670901,0.00109177,0.002563932,0.0005615435,0.00001643558,0.000006403767,0.00001989873,0.002844546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7243918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1665136186326223,"score_gpt":0.3861125634728378,"score_spread":0.2195989448402156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}