{"id":"W2154971036","doi":"10.1007/s004420100682","title":"Population density and small-scale variation in habitat quality affect phenotypic quality in roe deer","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oecologia","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Capreolus; Roe deer; Biology; Habitat; Ecology; Woodland; Foraging; Population; Deciduous; Beech; Population density","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001561061,0.00009542436,0.0001723344,0.0000420035,0.00008402288,0.00001319362,0.00007386335,0.0001765386,0.0003189154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003165953,0.00009735201,0.00001948911,0.000224902,0.00006322764,0.0002170732,0.00007616787,0.0001446384,0.00008789057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002966029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000799235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003995078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2114087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985961,0.0005052169,0.0002921913,0.0003053375,0.00009463398,0.0002065502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994354,0.0002740812,0.0001077303,0.0001412696,0.000005996413,0.00003551359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006547027,0.0001040025,0.9969908,0.000004894268,0.000001732124,0.000003111903,0.0002266909,0.0003770588,0.0007606951,0.000214434,0.00003769137,0.00121342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004638041,0.00003776742,0.9951204,0.000003129504,0.000003863814,0.000001721415,0.00003531983,0.0006194611,0.000019868,0.003565898,0.00001259693,0.0001161771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978182,0.000006075868,0.0003334561,0.0006236373,0.000102664,0.0002608914,8.305698e-7,0.00002773949,0.0008264766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986209,0.00000579759,0.0006729406,0.0005340672,0.00001359376,0.00002711379,0.00001482213,0.000004075979,0.0001066731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2074137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.802981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02197704426454428,"score_gpt":0.2701353799825268,"score_spread":0.2481583357179825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}