{"id":"W2154987128","doi":"10.1139/x01-154","title":"A new mixed analytical method for genetic analysis of diallel data","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Best linear unbiased prediction; Diallel cross; Statistics; Mixed model; Mating design; Tree breeding; Estimator; Linear model; Generalized linear mixed model; Breeding program; Mathematics; Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology; Machine learning; Hybrid; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002920434,0.00008362417,0.0002972994,0.0008343655,0.0001524176,0.00003496601,0.001247,0.00007807276,0.003309245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007622584,0.00007288483,0.0001417121,0.001537604,0.0002830617,0.0001492042,0.000170948,0.0002339486,0.00003243182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002348355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005860957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03690887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.744018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982129,0.0001787194,0.0003966836,0.0002327599,0.0004250637,0.0005538217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980435,0.0003566614,0.0001165562,0.0005503201,0.00008252883,0.0008503807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001032923,0.00004337556,0.8161145,0.000009730275,0.0008181239,0.0002573715,0.0001523901,0.02257728,0.00001924072,0.005764563,0.1345164,0.01962369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000401533,0.0002796095,0.8848091,0.000006907567,0.0003857918,0.00002145075,0.000077121,0.02809212,0.000006784108,0.006783267,0.07905858,0.00007778918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6752435,0.0003344734,0.3125828,0.004059559,0.0002512909,0.0005597821,0.00007935264,0.000003753959,0.006885517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9345069,0.00006290466,0.06232983,0.00009213619,0.0001166692,0.000005033048,0.00002604541,0.00001417538,0.002846328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7071092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09997592679892836,"score_gpt":0.3853159721961283,"score_spread":0.2853400453972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}